Re: DBHold and DBFlush
Paul Timms
4-29-25
From what I've read, using these will store the updated records in memory and then write them to the database in bulk, instead of each record writing to the database in turn. So perhaps there's still a small performance benefit, even now? It would be useful to get some advice on this from a C-level developer.
Leave Comment
You can subscribe to notifications for this post by selecting the 'star' icon on the top right corner of the post.
Latest Posts
Paul Timms
I've found an issue which I'm trying to find the best way to resolve. An integrated proof of delivery system sends two pieces of data to the SERP API, in two separate calls - let's c...
17:59 20 Feb 2026
Andis Blicāns, Grasko
There are some topics in this Q&A related to this question, but none of them is about Idle users - Concurrent or Named. If timeout minutes are specified in Optional Features, then all idle users are...
15:53 18 Feb 2026