Re: DBHold and DBFlush
Paul Timms
4-29-25
From what I've read, using these will store the updated records in memory and then write them to the database in bulk, instead of each record writing to the database in turn. So perhaps there's still a small performance benefit, even now? It would be useful to get some advice on this from a C-level developer.
Leave Comment
You can subscribe to notifications for this post by selecting the 'star' icon on the top right corner of the post.
Latest Posts
Piotr Wycichowski
Hi, Is somebody experienced in necessary settings for successful connection to server using webclient. When I tried, I got warning in brower, that Web client settings for HTTPS is not setup. So I ...
12:59 21 July 2025
Bror-Erik Kotiranta
Clients have their own cache, and then the server has the shared cache, if you want it kind of black and white. Presense should be there as far as i know...
10:55 7 July 2025