Re: DBHold and DBFlush
Paul Timms
4-29-25
From what I've read, using these will store the updated records in memory and then write them to the database in bulk, instead of each record writing to the database in turn. So perhaps there's still a small performance benefit, even now? It would be useful to get some advice on this from a C-level developer.
Leave Comment
You can subscribe to notifications for this post by selecting the 'star' icon on the top right corner of the post.
Latest Posts
Hi there, Server – tried both Windows Server 2022 and Linux Version - 2025-08-11 and 2026-05-25 We were testing a new version (2025-08-11) with a Halcust that we had migrated from the existing ...
10:11 4 Aug 2026
Kevin Stepper
Hi, years ago we used to have the email and conference module. Did not need it so we dropped it. We hav recently implemented global users, which are all named users and therefor seem to need a m...
18:07 3 Aug 2026