HAL questions
crash
Aldevinas Katkus
8-10-17
Client ,migrated from 8.3 2017-02-12 to to the 8.3 2017-04-26 and it started to crash the client in the client -server mode. Is there something specific to this release. I cannot find differences in the source.

2017-08-10 16:46:08 8.3 2017-04-26 (build 83250600)


2017-08-10 16:48:14 TG runtime error, hal stack is:HAL routine not found: GETONACCBALANCE
2017-08-10 16:48:14 TG dump of call stack
2017-08-10 16:48:14 TG call stack entry: halcust\level0\CUVcWActionTool.hal: GETFINDCUSTBALANCE
2017-08-10 16:48:14 TG call stack entry: halcust\level0\CUVcWActionTool.hal: GETFINDCUSTBALANCE
2017-08-10 16:48:14 TG call stack entry: halcust\level0\CUVcWActionTool.hal: GETCUSTANDBAL2
2017-08-10 16:48:14 TG call stack entry: halcust\level0\CUVcWActionTool.hal: GETCUSTANDBAL
2017-08-10 16:48:14 TG call stack entry: halcust\level0\QTVcWAction.hal: QTDCLASSCUSTCODEBALANCE
2017-08-10 16:48:14 TG call stack entry: halcust\level0\QTVcWAction.hal: QTDCLASSCUSTCODEEFAFTER

2017-08-10 16:48:14 TG call stack entry: halcust\level0\QTVcWAction.hal: QTDCLASSAFTEREDITFIELD

Reply
Aldevinas Katkus
8-16-17
I changed external procedure GetOnAccBalance to remote procedure...
in CUVcWActionTool.hal and there are no more crashes. Strange.
Reply
Erik Elmgren
8-24-17
Created byAldevinas Katkus08:25 16 Aug 2017
I changed external procedure GetOnAccBalance to remote procedure... in CUVcWActionTool.hal and there are no more crashes. Strange.
GetOnAccBalance is in ARRnTool.hal which is in server.hob. This file is not present on clients so must be called "remote" from a client.
Reply
Aldevinas Katkus
9-15-17
Created byErik Elmgren13:46 24 Aug 2017
GetOnAccBalance is in ARRnTool.hal which is in server.hob. This file is not present on clients so must be called "remote" from a client.
I guessed it is the case, however it worked earlier with no problems. Thanks for the explanation.
Reply
Paul Timms
9-18-17
When you install the client from a download, it includes server.hob. But when you auto-update the client, it does not.
Reply
Leave Comment
You can subscribe to notifications for this post by selecting the 'star' icon on the top right corner of the post.
Back to the list
Latest Posts
Re: Server crash with EInvoicing function
David Delač
Hi Gastón, Please report a bug in our issue tracker and attach test database that you can repeat this in so I can have a look. Paste subject here once done...
09:46 14 May 2025
Re: DBHold and DBFlush
Paul Timms
From what I've read, using these will store the updated records in memory and then write them to the database in bulk, instead of each record writing to the database in turn. So perhaps there&apo...
17:53 29 Apr 2025